↓ Skip to main content

Natural Killer Cells and Liver Fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural Killer Cells and Liver Fibrosis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Fasbender, Agata Widera, Jan G. Hengstler, Carsten Watzl

Abstract

In the 40 years since the discovery of natural killer (NK) cells, it has been well established that these innate lymphocytes are important for early and effective immune responses against transformed cells and infections with different pathogens. In addition to these classical functions of NK cells, we now know that they are part of a larger family of innate lymphoid cells and that they can even mediate memory-like responses. Additionally, tissue-resident NK cells with distinct phenotypical and functional characteristics have been identified. Here, we focus on the phenotype of different NK cell subpopulations that can be found in the liver and summarize the current knowledge about the functional role of these cells with a special emphasis on liver fibrosis. NK cell cytotoxicity can contribute to liver damage in different forms of liver disease. However, NK cells can limit liver fibrosis by killing hepatic stellate cell-derived myofibroblasts, which play a key role in this pathogenic process. Therefore, liver NK cells need to be tightly regulated in order to balance these beneficial and pathological effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 6 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 27 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,338,490
of 26,559,762 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#8,000
of 33,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,899
of 409,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#33
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.