The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immune Reconstitution after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00507 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justyna Ogonek, Mateja Kralj Juric, Sakhila Ghimire, Pavankumar Reddy Varanasi, Ernst Holler, Hildegard Greinix, Eva Weissinger |
| Abstract |
The timely reconstitution and regain of function of a donor-derived immune system is of utmost importance for the recovery and long-term survival of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Of note, new developments such as umbilical cord blood or haploidentical grafts were associated with prolonged immunodeficiency due to delayed immune reconstitution, raising the need for better understanding and enhancing the process of immune reconstitution and finding strategies to further optimize these transplant procedures. Immune reconstitution post-HSCT occurs in several phases, innate immunity being the first to regain function. The slow T cell reconstitution is regarded as primarily responsible for deleterious infections with latent viruses or fungi, occurrence of graft-versus-host disease, and relapse. Here we aim to summarize the major steps of the adaptive immune reconstitution and will discuss the importance of immune balance in patients after HSCT. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 467 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 465 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 13% |
| Researcher | 60 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 10% |
| Other | 46 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 9% |
| Other | 72 | 15% |
| Unknown | 136 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 34% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 57 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 7% |
| Unknown | 147 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,547,087
of 26,383,000 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#2,596
of 33,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,625
of 423,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#18
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.