↓ Skip to main content

Interplay of Regulatory T Cell and Th17 Cells during Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interplay of Regulatory T Cell and Th17 Cells during Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharvan Sehrawat, Barry T. Rouse

Abstract

It is now clear that the outcome of an inflammatory process caused by infections depends on the balance of responses by several components of the immune system. Of particular relevance is the interplay between regulatory T cells (Tregs) and CD4(+) T cells that produce IL-17 (Th17 cells) during immunoinflammatory events. In addition to discussing studies done in mice to highlight some unresolved issues in the biology of these cells, we emphasize the need to include outbred animals and humans in analyses. Achieving a balance between Treg and Th17 cells responses represents a powerful approach to control events during immunity and immunopathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 25 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,599,791
of 26,198,325 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#8,846
of 32,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,112
of 327,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#168
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,198,325 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.