↓ Skip to main content

Notch Signaling in T Helper Cell Subsets: Instructor or Unbiased Amplifier?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Notch Signaling in T Helper Cell Subsets: Instructor or Unbiased Amplifier?
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00419
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irma Tindemans, Marlies J. W. Peeters, Rudi W. Hendriks

Abstract

For protection against pathogens, it is essential that naïve CD4(+) T cells differentiate into specific effector T helper (Th) cell subsets following activation by antigen presented by dendritic cells (DCs). Next to T cell receptor and cytokine signals, membrane-bound Notch ligands have an important role in orchestrating Th cell differentiation. Several studies provided evidence that DC activation is accompanied by surface expression of Notch ligands. Intriguingly, DCs that express the delta-like or Jagged Notch ligands gain the capacity to instruct Th1 or Th2 cell polarization, respectively. However, in contrast to this model it has also been hypothesized that Notch signaling acts as a general amplifier of Th cell responses rather than an instructive director of specific T cell fates. In this alternative model, Notch enhances proliferation, cytokine production, and anti-apoptotic signals or promotes co-stimulatory signals in T cells. An instructive role for Notch ligand expressing DCs in the induction of Th cell differentiation is further challenged by evidence for the involvement of Notch signaling in differentiation of Th9, Th17, regulatory T cells, and follicular Th cells. In this review, we will discuss the two opposing models, referred to as the "instructive" and the "unbiased amplifier" model. We highlight both the function of different Notch receptors on CD4(+) T cells and the impact of Notch ligands on antigen-presenting cells.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,350,130
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#8,119
of 33,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,150
of 328,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#150
of 427 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 427 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.