↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Estrogen Membrane Receptor (G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor 1) in Skin Inflammation Induced by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Serum IgG

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Estrogen Membrane Receptor (G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor 1) in Skin Inflammation Induced by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Serum IgG
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01723
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenming Cai, Changhao Xie, Wei Qiao, Xibin Fei, Xuanxuan Guo, Huicheng Liu, Xiaoyan Li, Xiang Fang, Guangqiong Xu, Hui Dou, Guo-Min Deng

Abstract

Skin injury is the second most common clinical manifestation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Estrogen may affect the onset and development of SLE through its receptor. In this study, we investigated the role of estrogen membrane receptor G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) in skin injury of SLE. We found that skin injury induced by SLE serum was more severe in female mice and required monocytes. Estrogen promoted activation of monocytes induced by lupus IgG through the membrane receptor GPER1 which was located in lipid rafts. Blockade of GPER1 and lipid rafts reduced skin inflammation induced by SLE serum. The results we obtained suggest that GPER1 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of skin inflammation induced by lupus IgG and might be a therapeutic target in skin lesions of patients with SLE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,755
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,622
of 445,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#496
of 590 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 590 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.