↓ Skip to main content

Minimum Information about T Regulatory Cells: A Step toward Reproducibility and Standardization

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimum Information about T Regulatory Cells: A Step toward Reproducibility and Standardization
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01844
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anke Fuchs, Mateusz Gliwiński, Nathali Grageda, Rachel Spiering, Abul K. Abbas, Silke Appel, Rosa Bacchetta, Manuela Battaglia, David Berglund, Bruce Blazar, Jeffrey A. Bluestone, Martin Bornhäuser, Anja ten Brinke, Todd M. Brusko, Nathalie Cools, Maria Cristina Cuturi, Edward Geissler, Nick Giannoukakis, Karolina Gołab, David A. Hafler, S. Marieke van Ham, Joanna Hester, Keli Hippen, Mauro Di Ianni, Natasa Ilic, John Isaacs, Fadi Issa, Dorota Iwaszkiewicz-Grześ, Elmar Jaeckel, Irma Joosten, David Klatzmann, Hans Koenen, Cees van Kooten, Olle Korsgren, Karsten Kretschmer, Megan Levings, Natalia Maria Marek-Trzonkowska, Marc Martinez-Llordella, Djordje Miljkovic, Kingston H.G. Mills, Joana P. Miranda, Ciriaco A. Piccirillo, Amy L. Putnam, Thomas Ritter, Maria Grazia Roncarolo, Shimon Sakaguchi, Silvia Sánchez-Ramón, Birgit Sawitzki, Ljiljana Sofronic-Milosavljevic, Megan Sykes, Qizhi Tang, Marta Vives-Pi, Herman Waldmann, Piotr Witkowski, Kathryn J. Wood, Silvia Gregori, Catharien M. U. Hilkens, Giovanna Lombardi, Phillip Lord, Eva M. Martinez-Caceres, Piotr Trzonkowski

Abstract

Cellular therapies with CD4+ T regulatory cells (Tregs) hold promise of efficacious treatment for the variety of autoimmune and allergic diseases as well as posttransplant complications. Nevertheless, current manufacturing of Tregs as a cellular medicinal product varies between different laboratories, which in turn hampers precise comparisons of the results between the studies performed. While the number of clinical trials testing Tregs is already substantial, it seems to be crucial to provide some standardized characteristics of Treg products in order to minimize the problem. We have previously developed reporting guidelines called minimum information about tolerogenic antigen-presenting cells, which allows the comparison between different preparations of tolerance-inducing antigen-presenting cells. Having this experience, here we describe another minimum information about Tregs (MITREG). It is important to note that MITREG does not dictate how investigators should generate or characterize Tregs, but it does require investigators to report their Treg data in a consistent and transparent manner. We hope this will, therefore, be a useful tool facilitating standardized reporting on the manufacturing of Tregs, either for research purposes or for clinical application. This way MITREG might also be an important step toward more standardized and reproducible testing of the Tregs preparations in clinical applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Other 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 42 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,510,233
of 26,161,782 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#2,507
of 33,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,712
of 474,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#72
of 628 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,161,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 628 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.