↓ Skip to main content

Follicular CD4 T Helper Cells As a Major HIV Reservoir Compartment: A Molecular Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Follicular CD4 T Helper Cells As a Major HIV Reservoir Compartment: A Molecular Perspective
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00895
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malika Aid, Frank P. Dupuy, Eirini Moysi, Susan Moir, Elias K. Haddad, Jacob D. Estes, Rafick Pierre Sekaly, Constantinos Petrovas, Susan Pereira Ribeiro

Abstract

Effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) has prevented the progression to AIDS and reduced HIV-related morbidities and mortality for the majority of infected individuals. However, a lifelong administration of ART is necessary, placing an inordinate burden on individuals and public health systems. Therefore, discovering therapeutic regimens able to eradicate or functionally cure HIV infection is of great importance. ART interruption leads to viral rebound highlighting the establishment and maintenance of a latent viral reservoir compartment even under long-term treatment. Follicular helper CD4 T cells (TFH) have been reported as a major cell compartment contributing to viral persistence, consequent to their susceptibility to infection and ability to release replication-competent new virions. Here, we discuss the molecular profiles and potential mechanisms that support the role of TFH cells as one of the major HIV reservoirs.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 17 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,579,946
of 26,343,220 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#10,525
of 32,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,665
of 345,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#310
of 734 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,343,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 734 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.