↓ Skip to main content

Gingival Periodontal Disease (PD) Level-Butyric Acid Affects the Systemic Blood and Brain Organ: Insights Into the Systemic Inflammation of Periodontal Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gingival Periodontal Disease (PD) Level-Butyric Acid Affects the Systemic Blood and Brain Organ: Insights Into the Systemic Inflammation of Periodontal Disease
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marni E. Cueno, Kuniyasu Ochiai

Abstract

Butyric acid (BA) is produced by periodontopathic bacterial pathogens and contributes to periodontal disease (PD) induction. Moreover, PD has been associated with detrimental effects which subsequently may lead to systemic disease (SD) development affecting certain organs. Surprisingly, the potential systemic manifestations and organ-localized effects of BA have never been elucidated. Here, we simulated BA-based oral infection among young (20-week-old) rats and isolated blood cytosol to determine BA effects on stress network-related signals [total heme, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), free fatty acid (FFA), NADP/NADPH], inflammation-associated signals [caspases (CASP12 and CASP1), IL-1β, TNF-α, metallomatrix proteinase-9 (MMP-9), and toll-like receptor-2 (TLR2)], and neurological blood biomarkers [presenilin (PS1 and PS2) and amyloid precursor protein (APP)]. Similarly, we extracted the brain from both control and BA-treated rats, isolated the major regions (hippocampus, pineal gland, hypothalamus, cerebrum, and cerebellum), and, subsequently, measured stress network-related signals [oxidative stress: total heme, NADPH, H2O2, GR, and FFA; ER stress: GADD153, calcium, CASP1, and CASP3] and a brain neurodegenerative biomarker (Tau). In the blood, we found that BA was no longer detectable. Nevertheless, oxidative stress and inflammation were induced. Interestingly, amounts of representative inflammatory signals (CASP12, CASP1, IL-1β, and TNF-α) decreased while MMP-9 levels increased which we believe would suggest that inflammation was MMP-9-modulated and would serve as an alternative inflammatory mechanism. Similarly, TLR2 activity was increased which would insinuate that neurological blood biomarkers (APP, PS1, and PS2) were likewise affected. In the brain, BA was not detected, however, we found that both oxidative and ER stresses were likewise altered in all brain regions. Interestingly, tau protein amounts were significantly affected in the cerebellar and hippocampal regions which coincidentally are the major brain regions affected in several neurological disorders. Taken together, we propose that gingival BA can potentially cause systemic inflammation ascribable to prolonged systemic manifestations in the blood and localized detrimental effects within the brain organ.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 16 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Unspecified 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 18 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#22,587
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,827
of 342,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#593
of 743 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 743 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.