↓ Skip to main content

Trans-Allelic Model for Prediction of Peptide:MHC-II Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trans-Allelic Model for Prediction of Peptide:MHC-II Interactions
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01410
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdoelnaser M. Degoot, Faraimunashe Chirove, Wilfred Ndifon

Abstract

Major histocompatibility complex class two (MHC-II) molecules are trans-membrane proteins and key components of the cellular immune system. Upon recognition of foreign peptides expressed on the MHC-II binding groove, CD4+ T cells mount an immune response against invading pathogens. Therefore, mechanistic identification and knowledge of physicochemical features that govern interactions between peptides and MHC-II molecules is useful for the design of effective epitope-based vaccines, as well as for understanding of immune responses. In this article, we present a comprehensive trans-allelic prediction model, a generalized version of our previous biophysical model, that can predict peptide interactions for all three human MHC-II loci (HLA-DR, HLA-DP, and HLA-DQ), using both peptide sequence data and structural information of MHC-II molecules. The advantage of this approach over other machine learning models is that it offers a simple and plausible physical explanation for peptide-MHC-II interactions. We train the model using a benchmark experimental dataset and measure its predictive performance using novel data. Despite its relative simplicity, we find that the model has comparable performance to the state-of-the-art method, the NetMHCIIpan method. Focusing on the physical basis of peptide-MHC binding, we find support for previous theoretical predictions about the contributions of certain binding pockets to the binding energy. In addition, we find that binding pocket P5 of HLA-DP, which was not previously considered as a primary anchor, does make strong contribution to the binding energy. Together, the results indicate that our model can serve as a useful complement to alternative approaches to predicting peptide-MHC interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 35%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 13%
Computer Science 4 13%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#14,880,687
of 26,304,916 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#11,997
of 32,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,093
of 344,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#349
of 735 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,304,916 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 735 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.