The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ontology and Function of Fibroblast-Like and Macrophage-Like Synoviocytes: How Do They Talk to Each Other and Can They Be Targeted for Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01467 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiajie Tu, Wenming Hong, Pengying Zhang, Xinming Wang, Heinrich Körner, Wei Wei |
| Abstract |
Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) and macrophage-like synoviocytes (MLS) are the two main cellular components of the synovium. It has been widely reported that FLS and MLS play essential roles in the joint pathology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although various studies have analyzed both human and animal tissues and have shown that both cell types are involved in different stages of RA, ontology, and specific functions of both cell populations and their interactions are not well understood. In this review, we will summarize recent research on FLS and MLS in RA and focus on the development and function of two predominant synovial cell types. In addition, we will discuss the communication between FLS or MLS and highlight potential treatments for RA that involve synoviocytes. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,920,631
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#13,191
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,499
of 342,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#371
of 727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.