↓ Skip to main content

Arguing for Adaptive Clinical Trials in Sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arguing for Adaptive Clinical Trials in Sepsis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor B. Talisa, Sachin Yende, Christopher W. Seymour, Derek C. Angus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Computer Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,145,190
of 26,202,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#2,103
of 32,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,158
of 345,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#69
of 719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,202,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.