The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differential Mechanisms of Septic Human Pulmonary Microvascular Endothelial Cell Barrier Dysfunction Depending on the Presence of Neutrophils
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01743 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lefeng Wang, Sanjay Mehta, Yousuf Ahmed, Shelby Wallace, M. Cynthia Pape, Sean E. Gill |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 67% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 41% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,924,668
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#7,380
of 31,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,745
of 341,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#182
of 638 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 638 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.