↓ Skip to main content

Interleukin-33 Contributes to the Induction of Th9 Cells and Antitumor Efficacy by Dectin-1-Activated Dendritic Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interleukin-33 Contributes to the Induction of Th9 Cells and Antitumor Efficacy by Dectin-1-Activated Dendritic Cells
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01787
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jintong Chen, Yinghua Zhao, Yuxue Jiang, Sujun Gao, Yiming Wang, Dongjiao Wang, Alison Wang, Huanfa Yi, Rui Gu, Qing Yi, Siqing Wang

Abstract

We recently discovered that dectin-1-activated dendritic cells (DCs) drive potent T helper (Th) 9 cell responses and antitumor immunity. However, the underlying mechanisms need to be further defined. The cytokine microenvironment is critical for Th cell differentiation. Here, we show that dectin-1 activation enhances interleukin (IL)-33 expression in DCs. We found that blocking IL-33/ST2 inhibits dectin-1-activated DC-induced Th9 cell differentiation. More importantly, the addition of IL-33 further promotes Th9 cell priming and antitumor efficacy induced by dectin-1-activated DCs. Mechanistically, in addition to the promotion of Th9 and Th1 cells, dectin-1-activated DCs combined with IL-33 abolish the activity of IL-33 in the induction of regulatory T cells. Furthermore, the combined treatment of dectin-1-activated DCs and IL-33 increases the frequencies of CD4+ T cells by fostering their proliferation and inhibiting their exhaustive differentiation. Thus, our results demonstrate the important role of IL-33 in dectin-1-activated DC-induced Th9 cell differentiation and antitumor efficacy, and suggest that the combination of dectin-1-activated DCs and IL-33 may present a new effective modality of DC-based vaccines in tumor immunotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 25%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 10 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,874,146
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,999
of 33,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,366
of 344,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#463
of 636 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 636 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.