↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular Vesicles Work as a Functional Inflammatory Mediator Between Vascular Endothelial Cells and Immune Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracellular Vesicles Work as a Functional Inflammatory Mediator Between Vascular Endothelial Cells and Immune Cells
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01789
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baharak Hosseinkhani, Sören Kuypers, Nynke M. S. van den Akker, Daniel G. M. Molin, Luc Michiels

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EV) mediated intercellular communication between monocytes and endothelial cells (EC) might play a major role in vascular inflammation and atherosclerotic plaque formation during cardiovascular diseases (CVD). While critical involvement of small (exosomes) and large EV (microvesicles) in CVD has recently been appreciated, the pro- and/or anti-inflammatory impact of a bulk EV (exosomes + microvesicles) on vascular cell function as well as their inflammatory capacity are poorly defined. This study aims to unravel the immunomodulatory content of EV bulk derived from control (uEV) and TNF-α induced inflamed endothelial cells (tEV) and to define their capacity to affect the inflammatory status of recipients monocytes (THP-1) and endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. Here, we show that EV derived from inflamed vascular EC were readily taken up by THP-1 and HUVEC. Human inflammation antibody array together with ELISA revealed that tEV contain a pro-inflammatory profile with chemotactic mediators, including intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, CCL-2, IL-6, IL-8, CXCL-10, CCL-5, and TNF-α as compared to uEV. In addition, EV may mediate a selective transfer of functional inflammatory mediators to their target cells and modulate them toward either pro-inflammatory (HUVEC) or anti/pro-inflammatory (THP-1) mode. Accordingly, the expression of pro-inflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-8, and ICAM-1) in tEV-treated HUVEC was increased. In the case of THP-1, EC-EV do induce a mixed of pro- and anti-inflammatory response as indicated by the elevated expression of ICAM-1, CCL-4, CCL-5, and CXCL-10 proteins. At the functional level, EC-EV mediated inflammation and promoted the adhesion and migration of THP-1. Taken together, our findings proved that the EV released from inflamed EC were enriched with a cocktail of inflammatory markers, chemokines, and cytokines which are able to establish a targeted cross-talk between EC and monocytes and reprogramming them toward a pro- or anti-inflammatory phenotypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 49 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 55 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,861,983
of 26,161,782 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,985
of 33,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,439
of 344,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#452
of 626 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,161,782 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 626 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.