↓ Skip to main content

Development and Validation of a Multiplex Non-HLA Antibody Assay for the Screening of Kidney Transplant Recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and Validation of a Multiplex Non-HLA Antibody Assay for the Screening of Kidney Transplant Recipients
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, December 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena G Kamburova, Tineke Kardol-Hoefnagel, Bram W Wisse, Irma Joosten, Wil A Allebes, Arnold van der Meer, Luuk B Hilbrands, Marije C Baas, Eric Spierings, Cornelis E Hack, Franka E van Reekum, Arjan D van Zuilen, Marianne C Verhaar, Michiel L Bots, Adriaan C A D Drop, Loes Plaisier, Jan Meeldijk, Niels Bovenschen, Marc A J Seelen, Jan Stephan Sanders, Bouke G Hepkema, Annechien J A Lambeck, Laura B Bungener, Caroline Roozendaal, Marcel G J Tilanus, Christina E Voorter, Lotte Wieten, Elly M van Duijnhoven, Mariëlle A C J Gelens, Maarten H L Christiaans, Frans J van Ittersum, Shaikh A Nurmohamed, Neubury M Lardy, Wendy Swelsen, Karlijn A M I van der Pant, Neelke C van der Weerd, Ineke J M Ten Berge, Frederike J Bemelman, Paul J M van der Boog, Johan W de Fijter, Michiel G H Betjes, Sebastiaan Heidt, Dave L Roelen, Frans H Claas, Henny G Otten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,988,027
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#9,388
of 32,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,337
of 446,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#218
of 637 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 637 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.