The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differential Responses of Bovine Monocyte-Derived Macrophages to Infection by Neospora caninum Isolates of High and Low Virulence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00915 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marta García-Sánchez, Laura Jiménez-Pelayo, Pilar Horcajo, Javier Regidor-Cerrillo, Einar B. Ólafsson, Amol K. Bhandage, Antonio Barragan, Dirk Werling, Luis Miguel Ortega-Mora, Esther Collantes-Fernández |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 23% |
Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 10 | 23% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 23% |
Engineering | 3 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,062,760
of 26,414,132 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#12,357
of 33,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,196
of 366,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#333
of 688 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,414,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 688 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.