You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pertussis Prevention: Reasons for Resurgence, and Differences in the Current Acellular Pertussis Vaccines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01344 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanna Esposito, Paola Stefanelli, Norman K. Fry, Giorgio Fedele, Qiushui He, Pauline Paterson, Tina Tan, Markus Knuf, Carlos Rodrigo, Catherine Weil Olivier, Katie L. Flanagan, Ivan Hung, Iria Lutsar, Kathryn Edwards, Miguel O'Ryan, Nicola Principi, World Association of Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders and the Vaccine Study Group of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 83% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 60 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 68 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#932,289
of 26,212,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#834
of 32,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,455
of 365,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#25
of 672 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,212,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 672 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.