↓ Skip to main content

Human Antimicrobial RNases Inhibit Intracellular Bacterial Growth and Induce Autophagy in Mycobacteria-Infected Macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Antimicrobial RNases Inhibit Intracellular Bacterial Growth and Induce Autophagy in Mycobacteria-Infected Macrophages
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01500
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lu Lu, Javier Arranz-Trullén, Guillem Prats-Ejarque, David Pulido, Sanjib Bhakta, Ester Boix

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 26 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,764,998
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#15,421
of 31,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,783
of 362,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#390
of 693 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 693 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.