The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In silico Design of an Epitope-Based Vaccine Ensemble for Chagas Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02698 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lucas Michel-Todó, Pedro Antonio Reche, Pascal Bigey, Maria-Jesus Pinazo, Joaquim Gascón, Julio Alonso-Padilla |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
Researcher | 14 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 31 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 26% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,237,808
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#13,540
of 32,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,403
of 478,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#318
of 559 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 559 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.