↓ Skip to main content

Cancer Neoepitopes for Immunotherapy: Discordance Between Tumor-Infiltrating T Cell Reactivity and Tumor MHC Peptidome Display

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer Neoepitopes for Immunotherapy: Discordance Between Tumor-Infiltrating T Cell Reactivity and Tumor MHC Peptidome Display
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, December 2019
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02766
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stina L. Wickström, Tanja Lövgren, Michael Volkmar, Bruce Reinhold, Jonathan S. Duke-Cohan, Laura Hartmann, Janina Rebmann, Anja Mueller, Jeroen Melief, Roeltje Maas, Maarten Ligtenberg, Johan Hansson, Rienk Offringa, Barbara Seliger, Isabel Poschke, Ellis L. Reinherz, Rolf Kiessling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,704,163
of 26,268,316 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,522
of 32,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,550
of 484,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#168
of 568 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,268,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 568 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.