You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mouse Models and Tools for the in vivo Study of Neutrophils
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julien Stackowicz, Friederike Jönsson, Laurent L. Reber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 19% |
| Researcher | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 40 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,528,530
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,256
of 32,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,404
of 482,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#159
of 602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.