You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Primary Immune Regulatory Disorders (PIRD): A Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) Survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00239 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice Y. Chan, Jennifer W. Leiding, Xuerong Liu, Brent R. Logan, Lauri M. Burroughs, Eric J. Allenspach, Suzanne Skoda-Smith, Gulbu Uzel, Luigi D. Notarangelo, Mary Slatter, Andrew R. Gennery, Angela R. Smith, Sung-Yun Pai, Michael B. Jordan, Rebecca A. Marsh, Morton J. Cowan, Christopher C. Dvorak, John A. Craddock, Susan E. Prockop, Shanmuganathan Chandrakasan, Neena Kapoor, Rebecca H. Buckley, Suhag Parikh, Deepak Chellapandian, Benjamin R. Oshrine, Jeffrey J. Bednarski, Megan A. Cooper, Shalini Shenoy, Blachy J. Davila Saldana, Lisa R. Forbes, Caridad Martinez, Elie Haddad, David C. Shyr, Karin Chen, Kathleen E. Sullivan, Jennifer Heimall, Nicola Wright, Monica Bhatia, Geoffrey D. E. Cuvelier, Frederick D. Goldman, Isabelle Meyts, Holly K. Miller, Markus G. Seidel, Mark T. Vander Lugt, Rosa Bacchetta, Katja G. Weinacht, Jeffrey R. Andolina, Emi Caywood, Hey Chong, Maria Teresa de la Morena, Victor M. Aquino, Evan Shereck, Jolan E. Walter, Morna J. Dorsey, Christine M. Seroogy, Linda M. Griffith, Donald B. Kohn, Jennifer M. Puck, Michael A. Pulsipher, Troy R. Torgerson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Sudan | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 29% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,902,011
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,421
of 32,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,298
of 387,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#147
of 663 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 663 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.