↓ Skip to main content

Polymorphisms in STING Affect Human Innate Immune Responses to Poxviruses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Polymorphisms in STING Affect Human Innate Immune Responses to Poxviruses
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2020.567348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard B. Kennedy, Iana H. Haralambieva, Inna G. Ovsyannikova, Emily A. Voigt, Beth R. Larrabee, Daniel J. Schaid, Michael T. Zimmermann, Ann L. Oberg, Gregory A. Poland

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#15,957,962
of 26,556,730 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#15,061
of 33,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,443
of 441,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#465
of 864 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,730 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 864 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.