The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Immunological Insights in Equine Recurrent Uveitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2020.609855 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roxane L Degroote, Cornelia A Deeg |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,450,774
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,172
of 31,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,729
of 519,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#221
of 881 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 881 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.