You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Treatment Strategies for GLILD in Common Variable Immunodeficiency: A Systematic Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2021.606099 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Olivia A. C. Lamers, Bas M. Smits, Helen Louisa Leavis, Godelieve J. de Bree, Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles, Virgil A. S. H. Dalm, Hsi-en Ho, John R. Hurst, Hanna IJspeert, Sabine M. P. J. Prevaes, Alex Robinson, Astrid C. van Stigt, Suzanne Terheggen-Lagro, Annick A. J. M. van de Ven, Klaus Warnatz, Janneke H. H. M. van de Wijgert, Joris van Montfrans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 13% |
France | 2 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 40% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 27 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,322,907
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#3,553
of 33,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,992
of 460,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#175
of 1,281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.