↓ Skip to main content

Treatment Strategies for GLILD in Common Variable Immunodeficiency: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment Strategies for GLILD in Common Variable Immunodeficiency: A Systematic Review
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2021.606099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivia A. C. Lamers, Bas M. Smits, Helen Louisa Leavis, Godelieve J. de Bree, Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles, Virgil A. S. H. Dalm, Hsi-en Ho, John R. Hurst, Hanna IJspeert, Sabine M. P. J. Prevaes, Alex Robinson, Astrid C. van Stigt, Suzanne Terheggen-Lagro, Annick A. J. M. van de Ven, Klaus Warnatz, Janneke H. H. M. van de Wijgert, Joris van Montfrans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 25 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 40%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Computer Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 27 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,322,907
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#3,553
of 33,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,992
of 460,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#175
of 1,281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.