The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Over-Generalizing About GC (Hypoxia): Pitfalls of Limiting Breadth of Experimental Systems and Analyses in Framing Informatics Conclusions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2021.664249 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mark R. Boothby, Ariel Raybuck, Sung Hoon Cho, Kristy R. Stengel, Volker H. Haase, Scott Hiebert, Jingxin Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 15% |
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 31% |
Engineering | 2 | 15% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 15% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,763,735
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,194
of 31,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,303
of 454,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#266
of 1,365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.