↓ Skip to main content

Acute and Chronic Changes in Gene Expression After CMV DNAemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute and Chronic Changes in Gene Expression After CMV DNAemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2021.750659
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Ahn, Joanna Schaenman, Zachary Qian, Harry Pickering, Victoria Groysberg, Maura Rossetti, Megan Llamas, Alexander Hoffmann, David Gjertson, Mario Deng, Suphamai Bunnapradist, Elaine F. Reed, CMV Systems Immunobiology Group, Richard Ahn, Janice Arakawa-Hoyt, Patrick Boada, Jenny Brook, Suphamai Bunnapradist, Jim Cimino, Izabella Damm, Nakul Datta, Mario Deng, Don J. Diamond, Tin Doung, Janette Gadzhyan, David Elashoff, David Gjertson, Victoria Groysberg, Alexander Hoffmann, Kenichi Ishiyama, Maggie Kerwin, Lewis L. Lanier, Megan Llamas, Erik Lum, Dane Munar, Tariq Mukatash, Harry Pickering, Zachary Qian, Michelle Ramirez, Elaine F. Reed, Priyanka Rashmi, Rodney Rodgers, Dimitri Rychov, Minnie M. Sarwal, Joanna Schaenman, Subha Sen, Tara Sigdel, Danielle Sim, Marina Sirota, Swastika Sur, Otto Yang

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant patients with clinical complications including organ rejection and death. Whole blood gene expression dynamics in CMV viremic patients from onset of DNAemia through convalescence has not been well studied to date in humans. To evaluate how CMV infection impacts whole blood leukocyte gene expression over time, we evaluated a matched cohort of 62 kidney transplant recipients with and without CMV DNAemia using blood samples collected at multiple time points during the 12-month period after transplant. While transcriptomic differences were minimal at baseline between DNAemic and non-DNAemic patients, hundreds of genes were differentially expressed at the long-term timepoint, including genes enriching for pathways important for macrophages, interferon, and IL-8 signaling. Amongst patients with CMV DNAemia, the greatest amount of transcriptomic change occurred between baseline and 1-week post-DNAemia, with increase in pathways for interferon signaling and cytotoxic T cell function. Time-course gene set analysis of these differentially expressed genes revealed that most of the enriched pathways had a significant time-trend. While many pathways that were significantly down- or upregulated at 1 week returned to baseline-like levels, we noted that several pathways important in adaptive and innate cell function remained upregulated at the long-term timepoint after resolution of CMV DNAemia. Differential expression analysis and time-course gene set analysis revealed the dynamics of genes and pathways involved in the immune response to CMV DNAemia in kidney transplant patients. Understanding transcriptional changes caused by CMV DNAemia may identify the mechanism behind patient vulnerability to CMV reactivation and increased risk of rejection in transplant recipients and suggest protective strategies to counter the negative immunologic impact of CMV. These findings provide a framework to identify immune correlates for risk assessment and guiding need for extending antiviral prophylaxis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,425,961
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#8,362
of 33,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,667
of 435,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#413
of 1,457 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,457 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.