↓ Skip to main content

Preclinical Immune Response and Safety Evaluation of the Protein Subunit Vaccine Nanocovax for COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preclinical Immune Response and Safety Evaluation of the Protein Subunit Vaccine Nanocovax for COVID-19
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2021.766112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thi Nhu Mai Tran, Bruce Pearson May, Trong Thuan Ung, Mai Khoi Nguyen, Thi Thuy Trang Nguyen, Van Long Dinh, Chinh Chung Doan, The Vinh Tran, Hiep Khong, Thi Thanh Truc Nguyen, Hoang Quoc Huy Hua, Viet Anh Nguyen, Tan Phat Ha, Dang Luu Phan, Truong An Nguyen, Thi Ngoc Bui, Tieu My Tu, Thi Theo Nguyen, Thi Thuy Hang Le, Thi Lan Dong, Trong Hieu Huynh, Phien Huong Ho, Nguyen Thanh Thao Le, Cong Thao Truong, Hoang Phi Pham, Cong Y Luong, Nie Lim Y, Minh Ngoc Cao, Duy Khanh Nguyen, Thi Thanh Le, Duc Cuong Vuong, Le Khanh Hang Nguyen, Minh Si Do

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,673,471
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,504
of 31,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,219
of 514,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#71
of 1,463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.