The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impaired Functional T-Cell Response to SARS-CoV-2 After Two Doses of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine in Older People
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2021.778679 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Demaret, Bénédicte Corroyer-Simovic, Enagnon Kazali Alidjinou, Anne Goffard, Jacques Trauet, Sophie Miczek, Fanny Vuotto, Arnaud Dendooven, Dominique Huvent-Grelle, Juliette Podvin, Daniel Dreuil, Karine Faure, Dominique Deplanque, Laurence Bocket, Alain Duhamel, Julien Labreuche, Annie Sobaszek, Michael Hisbergues, Francois Puisieux, Myriam Labalette, Guillaume Lefèvre |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 13 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 62 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 96% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#905,225
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#802
of 32,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,869
of 415,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#39
of 1,435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.