The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation of Early Next-Generation Sequencing for Inborn Errors of Immunity: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Implications in Dutch Genome Diagnostic Centers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2021.780134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kim Elsink, Manon M. H. Huibers, Iris H. I. M. Hollink, Annet Simons, Evelien Zonneveld-Huijssoon, Lars T. van der Veken, Helen L. Leavis, Stefanie S. V. Henriet, Marcel van Deuren, Frank L. van de Veerdonk, Judith Potjewijd, Dagmar Berghuis, Virgil A. S. H. Dalm, Clementien L. Vermont, Annick A. J. M. van de Ven, Annechien J. A. Lambeck, Kristin M. Abbott, P. Martin van Hagen, Godelieve J. de Bree, Taco W. Kuijpers, Geert W. J. Frederix, Mariëlle E. van Gijn, Joris M. van Montfrans, the Genetics First for Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders Consortium, KJ Aerde van, J Altenburg, W Armbrust, BH Barendregt, JM Berg van den, RGM Bredius, EP Buddingh, M Burg van der, PM Ellerbroek, RF Ernst, PLA Fraaij, M Hermans, A Hoischen, AH Hout van der, MHA Jansen, H Jolink, RE Jonkers, JAM Laar van, K Leeuw de, GE Legger, EFA Leijten, M Limper, CA Lindemans, J Oever ten, M Pieterse, SM Rombach, AMC Rossum van, A Rutgers, GWE Santen, EH Schölvinck, A Simon, K Stol, RML Vervenne |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,069,091
of 26,301,262 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#7,534
of 32,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,546
of 529,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#346
of 1,508 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,301,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,508 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.