↓ Skip to main content

T-Cell Epitopes Shared Between Immunizing HLA and Donor HLA Associate With Graft Failure After Kidney Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
T-Cell Epitopes Shared Between Immunizing HLA and Donor HLA Associate With Graft Failure After Kidney Transplantation
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2021.784040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma T. M. Peereboom, Benedict M. Matern, Toshihide Tomosugi, Matthias Niemann, Julia Drylewicz, Irma Joosten, Wil A. Allebes, Arnold van der Meer, Luuk B. Hilbrands, Marije C. Baas, Franka E. van Reekum, Marianne C. Verhaar, Elena G. Kamburova, Marc A. J. Seelen, Jan Stephan Sanders, Bouke G. Hepkema, Annechien J. Lambeck, Laura B. Bungener, Caroline Roozendaal, Marcel G. J. Tilanus, Christien E. Voorter, Lotte Wieten, Elly M. van Duijnhoven, Mariëlle A. C. J. Gelens, Maarten H. L. Christiaans, Frans J. van Ittersum, Azam Nurmohamed, Neubury M. Lardy, Wendy Swelsen, Karlijn A. van der Pant, Neelke C. van der Weerd, Ineke J. M. ten Berge, Fréderike J. Bemelman, Aiko P. J. de Vries, Johan W. de Fijter, Michiel G. H. Betjes, Dave L. Roelen, Frans H. Claas, Henny G. Otten, Sebastiaan Heidt, Arjan D. van Zuilen, Takaaki Kobayashi, Kirsten Geneugelijk, Eric Spierings

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,776,768
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#11,858
of 33,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,039
of 528,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#570
of 1,437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.