The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rubella Virus Infected Macrophages and Neutrophils Define Patterns of Granulomatous Inflammation in Inborn and Acquired Errors of Immunity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2021.796065 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ludmila Perelygina, Raeesa Faisthalab, Emily Abernathy, Min-hsin Chen, LiJuan Hao, Lionel Bercovitch, Diana K. Bayer, Lenora M. Noroski, Michael T. Lam, Maria Pia Cicalese, Waleed Al-Herz, Arti Nanda, Joud Hajjar, Koen Vanden Driessche, Shari Schroven, Julie Leysen, Misha Rosenbach, Philipp Peters, Johannes Raedler, Michael H. Albert, Roshini S. Abraham, Hemalatha G. Rangarjan, David Buchbinder, Lisa Kobrynski, Anne Pham-Huy, Julie Dhossche, Charlotte Cunningham Rundles, Anna K. Meyer, Amy Theos, T. Prescott Atkinson, Amy Musiek, Mehdi Adeli, Ute Derichs, Christoph Walz, Renate Krüger, Horst von Bernuth, Christoph Klein, Joseph Icenogle, Fabian Hauck, Kathleen E. Sullivan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,786,558
of 26,580,681 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,691
of 33,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,567
of 530,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#306
of 1,512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,580,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.