The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Expression in the Silkworm and Induction of Efficient Protective Immunity by Inoculation With Alum Adjuvants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2021.803647 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akitsu Masuda, Jae Man Lee, Takeshi Miyata, Hiroaki Mon, Keita Sato, Kosuke Oyama, Yasuteru Sakurai, Jiro Yasuda, Daisuke Takahashi, Tadashi Ueda, Yuri Kato, Motohiro Nishida, Noriko Karasaki, Kohei Kakino, Takeru Ebihara, Takumi Nagasato, Masato Hino, Ayaka Nakashima, Kengo Suzuki, Yoshino Tonooka, Miyu Tanaka, Takato Moriyama, Hirokazu Nakatake, Ryosuke Fujita, Takahiro Kusakabe |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 20% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,518,157
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,342
of 31,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,686
of 517,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#64
of 1,562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.