↓ Skip to main content

Determination of CSF GFAP, CCN5, and vWF Levels Enhances the Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinically Defined MS From Non-MS Patients With CSF Oligoclonal Bands

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determination of CSF GFAP, CCN5, and vWF Levels Enhances the Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinically Defined MS From Non-MS Patients With CSF Oligoclonal Bands
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2021.811351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fay Probert, Tianrong Yeo, Yifan Zhou, Megan Sealey, Siddharth Arora, Jacqueline Palace, Timothy D. W. Claridge, Rainer Hillenbrand, Johanna Oechtering, Jens Kuhle, David Leppert, Daniel C. Anthony

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Chemistry 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#23,639,573
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#28,478
of 32,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#458,331
of 534,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#1,334
of 1,567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.