The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Case report: Persistence of residual antigen and RNA of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in tissues of two patients with long COVID
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1036894 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denise Goh, Jeffrey Chun Tatt Lim, Sonia Bilbao Fernaíndez, Craig Ryan Joseph, Sara Gil Edwards, Zhen Wei Neo, Justina Nadia Lee, Sílvia Guerrero Caballero, Mai Chan Lau, Joe Poh Sheng Yeong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,488,528
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#8,518
of 33,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,321
of 445,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#403
of 1,956 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,956 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.