The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Causal association between systemic lupus erythematosus and the risk of dementia: A Mendelian randomization study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1063110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tianyu Jin, Wei Huang, Fangzheng Cao, Xinyue Yu, Shunyuan Guo, Zhenhua Ying, Chao Xu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,039,521
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,626
of 33,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,369
of 494,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#180
of 1,655 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,655 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.