↓ Skip to main content

Discordance in STING-Induced Activation and Cell Death Between Mouse and Human Dendritic Cell Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discordance in STING-Induced Activation and Cell Death Between Mouse and Human Dendritic Cell Populations
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2022.794776
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ee Shan Pang, Ghazal Daraj, Katherine R. Balka, Dominic De Nardo, Christophe Macri, Hubertus Hochrein, Kelly-Anne Masterman, Peck S. Tan, Angus Shoppee, Zoe Magill, Nazneen Jahan, Mariam Bafit, Yifan Zhan, Benjamin T. Kile, Kate E. Lawlor, Kristen J. Radford, Mark D. Wright, Meredith O’Keeffe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 26%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Unspecified 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 17%
Unspecified 2 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,746,389
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#4,203
of 33,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,597
of 456,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#220
of 1,702 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,702 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.