↓ Skip to main content

Increased Seroprevalence and Improved Antibody Responses Following Third Primary SARS-CoV-2 Immunisation: An Update From the COV-AD Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased Seroprevalence and Improved Antibody Responses Following Third Primary SARS-CoV-2 Immunisation: An Update From the COV-AD Study
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2022.912571
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian M. Shields, Sian E. Faustini, Harriet J. Hill, Saly Al-Taei, Chloe Tanner, Fiona Ashford, Sarita Workman, Fernando Moreira, Nisha Verma, Hollie Wagg, Gail Heritage, Naomi Campton, Zania Stamataki, Mark T. Drayson, Paul Klenerman, James E. D. Thaventhiran, Shuayb Elkhalifa, Sarah Goddard, Sarah Johnston, Aarnoud Huissoon, Claire Bethune, Suzanne Elcombe, David M. Lowe, Smita Y. Patel, Sinisa Savic, Alex G. Richter, Siobhan O. Burns, the COV-AD consortium, Zahra Ahmed, Angus Best, Joanne Dasgin, Mohammad Dinally, Elena Efstathiou, Theresa McCarthy, Madeeha Hoque, Shannon Page, Timothy Plant, Zehra Suleiman, Neil Townsend, Charlotte Trinham, Sinead Walder, Hollie Bancroft, Michelle Bates, Hayley Clifford, Christopher McGee, Samuel Chee, Lucy Common, Archana Herwadkar, Karen Knowles, Maria Poulaka, Georgina Davis, Daniel Mullan, Stuart Wareham, Fatima Dhalla, Rashmi Jain, Hadeil Morsi, Nicholas Peters, Mark Gompels, Malgorzata Slowinsksa, Dan Hartland, Emily Heritage, Joe Humphreys, Deborah Hughes, Ann Ivory, Sinead Kelly, Eileen O’Grady, Archana Shajidevadas

Abstract

Patients with primary and secondary antibody deficiency are vulnerable to COVID-19 and demonstrate diminished responses following two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine schedules. Third primary vaccinations have been deployed to enhance their humoral and cellular immunity. To determine the immunogenicity of the third primary SARS-CoV-2 immunisation in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with antibody deficiency. Participants enrolled in the COV-AD study were sampled before and after their third vaccine dose. Serological and cellular responses were determined using ELISA, live-virus neutralisation and ELISPOT assays. Following a two-dose schedule, 100% of healthy controls mounted a serological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, however, 38.6% of individuals with antibody deficiency remained seronegative. A third primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccine significantly increased anti-spike glycoprotein antibody seroprevalence from 61.4% to 76.0%, the magnitude of the antibody response, its neutralising capacity and induced seroconversion in individuals who were seronegative after two vaccine doses. Vaccine-induced serological responses were broadly cross-reactive against the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 variant of concern, however, seroprevalence and antibody levels remained significantly lower than healthy controls. No differences in serological responses were observed between individuals who received AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Pfizer BioNTech 162b2 during their initial two-dose vaccine schedule. SARS-CoV-2 infection-naive participants who had received a heterologous vaccine as a third dose were significantly more likely to have a detectable T cell response following their third vaccine dose (61.5% vs 11.1%). These data support the widespread use of third primary immunisations to enhance humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in individuals with antibody deficiency.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 16 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,755,399
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#11,008
of 32,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,141
of 450,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#582
of 1,847 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,847 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.