The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From rough to precise: PD-L1 evaluation for predicting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockades
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2022.920021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xuan Zhao, Yulin Bao, Bi Meng, Zijian Xu, Sijin Li, Xu Wang, Rui Hou, Wen Ma, Dan Liu, Junnian Zheng, Ming Shi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#15,550,070
of 26,322,284 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#13,854
of 32,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,045
of 438,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#758
of 2,075 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,322,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,075 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.