The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epigenetic regulation of transcription factor binding motifs promotes Th1 response in Chagas disease cardiomyopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2022.958200 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pauline Brochet, Barbara Maria Ianni, Laurie Laugier, Amanda Farage Frade, João Paulo Silva Nunes, Priscila Camillo Teixeira, Charles Mady, Ludmila Rodrigues Pinto Ferreira, Quentin Ferré, Ronaldo Honorato Barros Santos, Andreia Kuramoto, Sandrine Cabantous, Samuel Steffen, Antonio Noedir Stolf, Pablo Pomerantzeff, Alfredo Inacio Fiorelli, Edimar Alcides Bocchi, Cristina Wide Pissetti, Bruno Saba, Darlan da Silva Cândido, Fabrício C. Dias, Marcelo Ferraz Sampaio, Fabio Antônio Gaiotto, José Antonio Marin-Neto, Abílio Fragata, Ricardo Costa Fernandes Zaniratto, Sergio Siqueira, Giselle De Lima Peixoto, Vagner Oliveira-Carvalho Rigaud, Fernando Bacal, Paula Buck, Rafael Ribeiro Almeida, Hui Tzu Lin-Wang, André Schmidt, Martino Martinelli, Mario Hiroyuki Hirata, Eduardo Antonio Donadi, Alexandre Costa Pereira, Virmondes Rodrigues, Denis Puthier, Jorge Kalil, Lionel Spinelli, Edecio Cunha-Neto, Christophe Chevillard |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 78% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#21,328,996
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#25,526
of 32,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#322,727
of 434,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#1,623
of 2,056 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,056 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.