↓ Skip to main content

Construction and validation of a robust prognostic model based on immune features in sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Construction and validation of a robust prognostic model based on immune features in sepsis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2022.994295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongxin Zheng, Baiyun Liu, Xiumei Deng, Yubiao Chen, Yongbo Huang, Yu Zhang, Yonghao Xu, Ling Sang, Xiaoqing Liu, Yimin Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#16,283,598
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#15,931
of 33,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,884
of 496,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#724
of 1,667 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,667 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.