You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inhibition of miRNA associated with a disease-specific signature and secreted via extracellular vesicles of systemic lupus erythematosus patients suppresses target organ inflammation in a humanized mouse model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1090177 |
| Authors |
Nicholas A. Young, Emily Schwarz, Braden M. Zeno, Shane Bruckner, Rosana A. Mesa, Kyle Jablonski, Lai-Chu Wu, Elisha D. O. Roberson, Wael N. Jarjour |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,306,361
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#18,999
of 32,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,514
of 189,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#102
of 590 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 590 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.