↓ Skip to main content

Biomarkers detected in cord blood predict vaccine responses in young infants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomarkers detected in cord blood predict vaccine responses in young infants
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2023
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1152538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolyn H. Baloh, Guglielmo M. Venturi, Bernard M. Fischer, Liane S. Sadder, Julie J. Kim-Chang, Cliburn Chan, Kristina De Paris, Li Yin, Grace M. Aldrovandi, Maureen M. Goodenow, John W. Sleasman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,082,431
of 26,173,059 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#9,500
of 32,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,269
of 406,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#272
of 1,332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,173,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.