↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Human pegivirus-1 replication influences NK cell reconstitution after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: Human pegivirus-1 replication influences NK cell reconstitution after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1170106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frontiers Production Office

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#20,791,337
of 25,545,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#25,014
of 31,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,142
of 425,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#1,184
of 1,551 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,545,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,551 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.