The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Research trends and hotspots of neuropathic pain in neurodegenerative diseases: a bibliometric analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1182411 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yujie Fu, Chan Gong, Chenchen Zhu, Weiquan Zhong, Jiabao Guo, Binglin Chen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,065,273
of 26,268,316 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,663
of 32,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,527
of 373,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#142
of 1,207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,268,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.