The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Beyond αβ T cells: NK, iNKT, and γδT cell biology in leukemic patients and potential for off-the-shelf adoptive cell therapies for AML
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202950 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Kent, Lyndsey S. Crump, Eduardo Davila |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 68% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 68% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,042,943
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,629
of 32,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,939
of 362,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#137
of 1,208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.