The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Case Report: Intervention of radiotherapy improves the prognosis of rectal squamous cell carcinoma with high PD-L1 expression and enable patients to obtain NED status
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1235697 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fuyin Qu, Linlin Xiao, Yuting Xiao, Chao Gao, Xuan Wang, Yi Wang, Yuanhang Gao, Fengpeng Wu, Ming Liu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,987,344
of 25,965,655 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#5,573
of 32,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,550
of 370,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#133
of 1,201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,965,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.