↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Community series in combinational immunotherapy of cancer: novel targets, mechanisms, and strategies, volume II

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Community series in combinational immunotherapy of cancer: novel targets, mechanisms, and strategies, volume II
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1256691
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caili Xu, Dianwen Ju, Xuyao Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#20,819,415
of 26,451,700 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#23,688
of 33,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,396
of 367,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#839
of 1,216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,451,700 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.