The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
B cell MHC haplotype affects follicular inclusion, germinal center participation and plasma cell differentiation in a mouse model of lupus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1258046 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camilla Wibrand, Thomas R. Wittenborn, Lasse Frank Voss, Gudrun Winther, Lisbeth Jensen, Alexey Ferapontov, Sofie V. Fonager, Cecilia Fahlquist-Hagert, Søren E. Degn |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,071,552
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#9,434
of 32,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,484
of 388,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#186
of 1,067 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,067 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.