The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
IL11-mediated stromal cell activation may not be the master regulator of pro-fibrotic signaling downstream of TGFβ
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1293883 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yunhao Tan, Kenta Mosallanejad, Qingxiu Zhang, Stephen O’Brien, Meghan Clements, Stuart Perper, Sarah Wilson, Sudiksha Chaulagain, Jing Wang, Mary Abdalla, Helen Al-Saidi, Danyal Butt, Anca Clabbers, Kwasi Ofori, Beth Dillon, Bohdan Harvey, John Memmott, Christopher Negron, David Winarta, Catherine Tan, Amlan Biswas, Feng Dong, Vanessa Morales-Tirado, Xiaoqing Lu, Gurminder Singh, Michael White, Shanna Ashley, Heather Knight, Susan Westmoreland, Lucy Phillips, Tracy Carr, Lauren Reinke-Breen, Rajeeva Singh, Jianwen Xu, Kan Wu, Lisa Rinaldi, Brian Stoll, Yupeng David He, Lisa Hazelwood, Jozsef Karman, Andrew McCluskey, William Stine, Ivan Correia, Stephen Gauld, Marc C. Levesque, Geertruida Veldman, Cedric Hubeau, Timothy Radstake, Ramkrishna Sadhukhan, Edda Fiebiger |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,037,898
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#931
of 33,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,834
of 359,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#28
of 1,220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.